Tihuatlán, Veracruz - The case of Irma Hernández, a 59-year-old retired schoolteacher-turned-taxi driver, whose death in Veracruz has become a national flashpoint, has called attention to the alarming levels of cartel violence in Veracruz. Additionally, it highlights the failures of local authorities to address the growing threat. What began as a shocking kidnapping incident has escalated into a highly politicized crisis. This involves accusations of governmental cover-ups, public unrest, and deep concerns about citizens' safety.
The Story of Irma Hernández
In mid-July 2025, Irma Hernández was abducted by a criminal group known as “La Mafia Veracruzana” in Tihuatlán, Veracruz. As a part-time taxi driver, she was among many working under extortion threats from organized crime groups in the region. On July 19, a disturbing video surfaced online. The footage, captured by the perpetrators, showed Irma visibly distressed and surrounded by armed men. In a chilling message, she pleaded with her fellow taxi drivers to pay extortion fees to the cartel. She warned, “Or you’ll end up like me.” The video went viral, sparking fear and sympathy across Veracruz. It also drew attention to the growing problem of extortion by cartels, which has plagued taxi drivers for years.
Tragically, just a day later, Irma was found dead. Veracruz authorities quickly attributed her death to a heart attack, specifically a myocardial infarction caused by the stress of the ordeal. However, skepticism from her family, human rights activists, and the public has cast doubt on the official narrative. They suggest that foul play or even violence at the hands of her captors could have contributed to her demise. This divergence in opinion has ignited a political firestorm. Many view Irma’s death as more than a medical incident, possibly as a feminicidio or gender-based killing.
Governor Nahle Faces Growing Criticism
The controversy surrounding Irma Hernández’s death reached a boiling point during a press conference held by Veracruz Governor Rocío Nahle on July 28, 2025. Nahle, who assumed office in late 2024, has faced intense scrutiny for her handling of the case. At the press conference, she reiterated the official conclusion that Irma died of a heart attack. She stated emphatically, “La maestra sufrió un infarto, les guste o no – esa fue la realidad” (“The teacher suffered a heart attack, like it or not – that’s the reality”).
Accompanied by the state’s Attorney General and a medical examiner, Nahle’s tone was one of frustration. This was particularly in response to those challenging the government’s findings. She accused critics of exploiting the tragedy for political gain and warned against perpetuating unsubstantiated theories. In an effort to back the official account, the Governor invited the chief coroner who performed Irma’s autopsy to speak at the press conference. The coroner’s statement provided a medical explanation, noting that while there were multiple injuries on Irma’s body, none were fatal. The cause of death, according to the autopsy, was indeed a heart attack. It was caused by extreme stress endured during the kidnapping.
Mixed Reactions and Rising Tensions
Governor Nahle’s blunt defense of the official explanation did little to quell public discontent. Many Veracruz residents, still reeling from the viral video of Irma’s captivity, found the government’s response dismissive. It seemed dismissive of the pain felt by Irma’s family and the broader community. The hashtag #LesGusteONo, which translates to “like it or not” – a phrase used by Nahle during the press conference – quickly gained traction on social media. Many users criticized her for appearing tone-deaf to the tragedy. Human rights groups condemned Nahle for attacking those seeking answers. They argued that a full and transparent investigation should not be feared or stifled.
Despite the backlash, Nahle's supporters echoed her stance. They asserted that sensationalizing the incident only served to amplify panic and undermine the rule of law. Some pointed to the positive news that two suspects linked to Irma’s kidnapping had been arrested by federal authorities. They called it a step forward in the fight against organized crime.
Irma’s family, however, remains unconvinced. While they accept the official cause of death, they argue that the extreme stress inflicted by the cartels led to her fatal heart attack. They consider her death a homicide in moral terms. They are calling for charges of murder or femicide to be brought against those responsible for her abduction.
Political Implications and Public Sentiment
The political fallout from this case is undeniable. Veracruz, a key state in Mexico’s national politics, has been grappling with cartel violence and organized crime for years. Governor Rocío Nahle, a prominent figure in the ruling Morena party and a former federal Energy Secretary, is facing her biggest test in office. Opposition figures accuse the Veracruz government of failing to protect its citizens from the cartels. They are demanding a more transparent investigation into Irma’s death.
In addition to the political ramifications, the case has sparked protests across Veracruz. This is particularly from women’s rights groups and taxi driver unions. Demonstrators have rallied behind Irma’s memory, demanding justice and an end to cartel control. The protest slogans, like “No fue infarto, fue terror” (“It wasn’t a heart attack, it was terror”), reflect public sentiment. They show that Irma’s death was a consequence of terror inflicted by criminal groups, rather than a mere medical event.
A Call for Transparency and Accountability
Irma Hernández’s death has become more than just a tragic incident; it has become a symbol of the broader crisis of organized crime and governmental transparency in Mexico. The debate over whether her death should be classified as a homicide or a natural death underscores deep divisions. It highlights the differences in how Mexicans view crime, justice, and government accountability. For Governor Rocío Nahle, her handling of this crisis will be remembered as a defining moment of her tenure. If she hopes to regain the trust of Veracruz’s citizens, she will need to address concerns with more than just a defense of the official narrative. The memory of Irma Hernández stands as a poignant reminder of the human cost of cartel violence. It highlights the need for a transparent and accountable government.
Sources:
- El Universal
- El País
- Veracruz State Government Press Release
- Statements from Governor Rocío Nahle and Chief Coroner José Eduardo Márquez
Veracruz, Irma Hernández, Rocío Nahle, La Mafia Veracruzana, femicide, Veracruz crime, kidnapping, Mexican politics, human rights, Governor Nahle
