As proof that he can successfully and humanely deport the estimated 11 million people living in the country illegally, Republican presidential contender Donald Trump often touts the efforts of the Eisenhower administration in the 1950s.
He did so again in this week’s Republican debate, saying “you don’t get nicer, you don’t get friendlier” than President Dwight D. Eisenhower. “They moved 1.5 million out,” the billionaire real estate mogul said. “We have no choice. We have no choice.”
But the program to which Trump refers, known as “Operation Wetback,” was a complicated undertaking largely viewed by historians as a dark moment in America’s past. Also lost in Trump’s telling is that it coincided with a guest worker program that provided legal status to hundreds of thousands of largely Mexican farm workers.
“He’s only got part of the story,” said Mae Ngai, a professor of history at Columbia University.
The operation was named after a term for Mexicans who crossed the Rio Grande that is now viewed a racial slur. The 1954 initiative was aimed at apprehending and deporting agricultural workers who had crossed the border illegally looking for work.
According to a summary of the project from the Texas State Historical Association, the United States Border Patrol “aided by municipal, county, state, and federal authorities, as well as the military, began a quasi-military operation of search and seizure of all unauthorized immigrants.”
The project, Ngai said, began with 750 immigration officers and border control agents, who used jeeps, trucks, buses and airplanes to apprehend migrants nationwide, including in Los Angeles, San Francisco and Chicago. They apprehended 3,000 people a day and 170,000 during its first three months.
In an interview Wednesday morning on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Trump indicated he would take a similar approach. “You’re going to have a deportation force, and you’re going to do it humanely,” he said.
Critics of the program say the conditions for those the agents apprehended were anything but humane. Many of the apprehended migrants were transported in crowded buses and dumped on the other side of the border in a manner some at the time equated with the treatment of livestock.
In one incident, Ngai said, 88 apprehended Mexicans died of sunstroke after being subjected to 112-degree heat. The number would have been higher had the Red Cross not intervened.
Some of those apprehended were sent deep into the interior of Mexico to prevent re-entry by train or cargo ship, where conditions drew the attention of federal regulators.
One congressional investigation likened a transport ship that was the site of a riot to an “eighteenth century slave ship” and a “penal hell ship.”
Trump touted the approach as a virtue of Eisenhower-era program in Tuesday night’s debate.
“Moved a 1.5 million illegal immigrants out of this country, moved them just beyond the border. They came back. Moved them again beyond the border, they came back. Didn’t like it,” Trump said. “Moved them way south. They never came back.”
Trump also leaves out of his advocacy for the Eisenhower-era approach the fact the program was developed to complement a guest worker program that began in the 1940s and was aimed at allowing Mexican farmworkers to enter the country and work in the U.S. legally.
Hundreds of thousands of farm workers did so, and the deportation effort was conceived as a way to pressure employers into using the guest worker program.
“It was like a carrot and a stick,” Ngai said.
While Trump has put the number of deportations at 1.5 million, most accounts suggest the numbers are far fewer, because they included those who chose to leave the country voluntarily as well as people who returned after being deported and were deported again.
Trump has yet to yet to lay out precisely how he would track down those living in the country illegally, or how he would determine who are “the good ones” that he would allow to return. Both John Kasich, Ohio’s governor, and Jeb Bush, the former governor of Florida, rejected Trump’s plan on Tuesday night as unrealistic and cruel.
“To send them back, 500,000 a month, is just not, not possible,” Bush said. “And it’s not embracing American values. And it would tear communities apart. And it would send a signal that we’re not the kind of country that I know America is.”
—
Follow Jill Colvin on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/colvinj
Receive the PVDN morning newsletter and exclusive content by becoming a PVDN Supporter, learn more here
